Legal Opinion

Sutton Motor Company v. Crysel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1956No. 5086PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Justice.

The appellee, E. R. Crysel, who will also be referred to as plaintiff, sued Sutton Motor Company and M. J. Porter for damages because of personal injuries which he alleges his wife sustained and because of damage done his automobile when, on August 21, 1954, in the city of Beaumont, his automobile, which he was driving, was in collision with a motor vehicle (a light wrecker) which was owned by Sutton Motor Company and was being driven by Porter. On a jury’s special-issue verdict, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff against defendants, jointly and severally, for the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. AckerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Bailey v. American General Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Stuart v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Texas Employers' Insurance v. MallardTexas Supreme Court · 1944

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dartez v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Haught v. MaceluchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Williamson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Martinez v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Callan v. CallanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API