Legal Opinion

Riley v. Havens

California Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1924No. S. F. No. 10499. S. F. No. 10500. S. F. No. 10501PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

These cases, presenting precisely the same questions of law, have been consolidated by the stipulations of the parties thereto, and are presented as one proceeding.

The actions were brought by the petitioner in his official capacity as state controller.

The appeals are taken by respondents and appellants, adult children of Elizabeth H. Havens, deceased, from judgments holding each respectively liable to the state for an inheritance transfer tax due upon certain shares of the capital stock of the M. K. Blake Estate Company, a corporation, the certificates of which were indorsed, transferred, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Billings v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  4. In Re Estate of FeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. In Re Estate of BrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Perkins Manufacturing Co. v. Clinton Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API