Legal Opinion

Shandy v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1934No. 25,889PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

The appellant filed her complaint in the lower court to quiet title against the appellees to the east half of an easement and right of way over a part of a city lot in the city of Princeton. The appellee, Mabel Bell, filed a cross-complaint against the appellant to quiet title to a part of said lot, the west line of which was the center line of said claimed easement and right of way.

It appears that on January 27, 1918, that Fannie Applegath and Joseph G. Applegath conveyed by warranty deed the whole of said lot 90 to the appellant herein. The lot was 50 feet east and west and 148 feet and 6…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  3. Ellis v. BassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Skinner v. SpannIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Donaldson v. State ex rel. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Searcy v. La GrotteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Watson v. StrohlIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bryant v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Whitt v. FerrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Besing Et Al. v. Ohio Valley Coal CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API