Legal Opinion
Popp v. Hardy
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 8, 1987No. 10A01-8612-CV-346PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiffs-appellants, James L. Popp and Ruth Sipes, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Louis G. Popp (Popp), appeal an adverse summary judgment rendered by the Clark Superior Court No. 2 in their suit to establish a prescriptive easement, which judgment was in favor of defendants-appellees, Claude E. Hardy and Rose J. Hardy (Hardy).
We reverse.
STATEMENT OF THE RECORD
On March 8, 1985, Popp filed his complaint to enjoin interference with his prescriptive easement across Hardy's land: Count I proceeded on a prescriptive easement theory; Count II claimed an easement…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Carrell v. EllingwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Criss v. BitzegaioIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Indiana University Hospitals v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Grantham Realty Corp. v. Bowers, Jr., Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Greives v. GreenwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- McCae Management Corp. v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of Muncie v. United National Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hermitage Insurance Co. v. SaltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.