Mahan v. State
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CADY, Judge.
Russell Mahan and Bryon Miller appeal from a district court order denying postcon-viction relief for sanctions imposed by the Newton Correctional Release Center (CRC). We affirm the district court’s order.
Mahan and Miller were inmates at the Newton CRC, a minimum security facility. In October 1992, the two men escaped from the facility. They were later apprehended and criminally prosecuted. After a hearing, the administrative law judge (ALJ) found both men in violation of the CRC’s rule against escape and disciplined Mahan and Miller.
In its ruling, the ALJ noted Mahan’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Bruns v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Kinnersley v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Habeas Corpus Application of PierpointSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Harpster v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997