Legal Opinion

Harpster v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 17, 1997No. 96-39PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

Michael Harpster appeals the district court’s denial of his application for posteon-viction relief, alleging that a disciplinary sanction of the forfeiture of 2000 days of accumulated good conduct time, subsequently reduced to 1000 days on administrative appeal, is excessive and improper under Iowa law and applicable constitutional safeguards. We affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings

On June 17, 1994, Michael Harpster, an inmate at the Newton Correctional Release Center (CRC), a minimum security unit in Newton, left his work detail at Rock Creek State Park. Corrections…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Hinkle v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goosman v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Wemark v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Maghee v. IOWA DIST. COURT JUDGE, READESupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Key v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API