Legal Opinion

Kinnersley v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1993No. 91-1834PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of David L. Kinnersley’s application for postconviction relief. We affirm.

In 1989, Kinnersley pled guilty to two drug offenses in violation of Iowa Code sections 204.401(l)(a) and (b) (1987). He claims that these convictions should be set aside because, prior to his plea, he was not informed that such convictions carry a minimum sentence pursuant to Iowa Code section 204.413 (1987). Kinnersley argues on appeal that (1) the district court failed to inform him of the mandatory minimum sentence in violation of Iowa Rule of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Saadiq v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Vincent Hunter v. Walter T. Fogg, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Polly v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. KressSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. CarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. State v. OldhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Whitsel v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. State v. ByrgeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API