Legal Opinion

In Re J.U.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 2, 2016No. 2 CA-JV 2016-0064PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:

¶ 1 J.U. and two other juveniles telephoned two schools and threatened them with a “terrorist attack,” resulting in the evacuation and closure of the schools. After an adjudication healing on a forty-eight count, amended delinquency petition, the juvenile court found J.U. had committed all but eight of the charges. On appeal, J.U. challenges the court’s restitution order, entered after a combined restitution and disposition hearing. We vacate a portion of the restitution order and affirm the remainder for the reasons that follow.

¶ 2 We view the evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. United States v. VakninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. State v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LinaresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Amanda Campion and James Campion v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
  3. David P. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Horst v. HorstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. In Re Kalib A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API