In Re J.U.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:
¶ 1 J.U. and two other juveniles telephoned two schools and threatened them with a “terrorist attack,” resulting in the evacuation and closure of the schools. After an adjudication healing on a forty-eight count, amended delinquency petition, the juvenile court found J.U. had committed all but eight of the charges. On appeal, J.U. challenges the court’s restitution order, entered after a combined restitution and disposition hearing. We vacate a portion of the restitution order and affirm the remainder for the reasons that follow.
¶ 2 We view the evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. VakninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- State v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Andrew C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LinaresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Amanda Campion and James Campion v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
- David P. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Horst v. HorstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- In Re Kalib A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.