Legal Opinion

Isenberg v. Sherman

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 12560PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This appeal is prosecuted by the complainants from a judgment in favor of respondents, made and entered by the trial court in an action tried before the court without a jury.

The complainants, seventeen in number, are stockholders, ex-stockholders, or represent existing or former stockholders of H. Iiackfeld & Company, Limited, an Hawaiian corporation. That corporation, during the period involved herein, had its principal place of business in Honolulu, and was engaged in the sugar factor and merchandising business.

The complaint is in equity, and is headed “Complaint for Accounting,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Sielcken-Schwarz v. American Factors, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API