Smith v. . McClung
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogdbk, J.
Does the principle of res ipsa loquitur apply when the point of a novocaine needle breaks off in the gum or jaw of a patient when the dentist is using the needle to insert novocaine preparatory to extracting a tooth?
The evidence does not disclose any defect in the needle or that the needle was not of the type approved and in general use for the purpose of inserting novocaine. There is no evidence that the dentist did not possess the degree of skill and learning contemplated and prescribed by law, nor was there any evidence that the tooth was otherwise extracted in a careless or negligent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Springs v. . DollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Ernen v.CrofwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Husketh v. Convenient Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Starnes v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Smith v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.