Legal Opinion

People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)

California Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2019No. S230923PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpinion of the Court by Liu, J.

**749 *107 *1115 In People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481 , 124 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 541 P.2d 545 ( Lent ), we held that "a condition of probation which requires or forbids conduct which is not itself criminal is valid if that conduct is reasonably related to the crime of which the defendant was convicted or to future criminality." ( Id. at p. 486, 124 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 541 P.2d 545 .) In this case, juvenile defendant Ricardo P. was placed on probation after admitting two counts of felony burglary. As a condition of his probation, the juvenile court required Ricardo to submit to warrantless searches of his…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  2. In re A.C. CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. In re A.W. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. In re Alonzo M.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. In re Amber K.California Court of Appeal · 2020

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API