Legal Opinion
People v. R.V.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 2009No. A121376PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
R.V., a ward of the juvenile court, appeals from a disposition order conditioning his probation on the requirement that he wear a global positioning system (GPS) device. He argues that this condition infringes his constitutional rights to privacy and equal protection of the laws. Although the appeal is now moot, the issue is likely to recur and we therefore address the merits of the argument and affirm.
Background
A juvenile wardship petition was filed on September 5, 2007, alleging that R.V. had received stolen property for the benefit of a criminal street gang. (Pen. Code, §§…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. Erica R.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. G.B. (In re G.B.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Keith C.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. A.M.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.