Legal Opinion
D. J. Moore Grocer Co. v. Pacific Rice Mills
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1924No. 6264PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
The defendant in error had a verdict and judgment against the plaintiff in error in an action for breach of a contract. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the-trial court. The defendant in error has submitted a motion to strike *829the bill of exceptions, because it was not allowed in the time provided by law for that purpose. The verdict was returned and the judgment was entered at the May term of the court. A motion for a new trial was filed during that term. It was overruled at the October term, but the journal entiy relating to the overruling of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- James Stewart & Co. v. NewbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920
- Merchants' Ins. Co. of Newark v. BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Camden Iron Works Co. v. SaterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Hunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rochester Civic Theatre, Inc. v. Maria RamsayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Davis v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Shallas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Bertino v. Marion Steam Shovel Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.