Legal Opinion

In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of Ringland

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1984No. C8-84-1535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant was committed to Anoka State Hospital by order dated May 29, 1984. She sought a new trial, arguing she never received a preliminary hearing. Prior to decision on the motion for a new trial, Ringland was fully discharged from the State Hospital. The referee denied the motion as moot. On review of the referee’s order, the district court found appellant’s rights were waived by her counsel. Ringland appeals the order for commitment and both orders denying her motion for a new trial. We affirm.

FACTS

On May 23, 1984, appellant was examined by Dr. David…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Doe v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. In Re Leary's AppealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. In Re the Alleged Mental Illness of RobledoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Godwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. In Re the Alleged Mental Illness Of: CordieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Matter of JostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API