Woods v. Pommerening

— This is a malpractice action against defendant doctors. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his case with prejudice, after trial to the court.

The record on appeal poses a question which must be resolved before the issues raised can be discussed.

Plaintiff contends that there are two sets of findings of fact before this court, stating that

“ . . . the only substantial difference between the two is that one set of findings is more complete than the other.”

There appears in the transcript, and in the statement of facts, a document entitled “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,” under…