Legal Opinion

Smith v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1954No. 32484PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The trial court sustained challenges to the legal sufficiency of the evidence and discharged the jury. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action with prejudice.

Appellant alleged damages for bums and a wrenched back suffered by him during a prostatic resection, an operation involving the removal of tissue from the prostate gland. The alleged damages resulted from electrical shocks caused by a short circuit in a Wappler Electro-Surgical Unit used for the operation. The unit was owned by the Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital.

Appellant sued (a) the American Cystoscope Makers, Inc.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Harrison Memorial HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Fritz v. HorsfallWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Brucker v. MatsenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Nelson v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Belknap Hardware & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  2. Corn v. FrenchNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Colagrossi v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hine v. FoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API