Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Sawyer State Bank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to recover upon notes executed and paid, for the benefit of the defendant bank. From a judgment rendered for the defendants and interveners dismissing the action, and, from an order denying a new trial, in the District Court of Ward County, Leighton, J., the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

(upon reargument). This action was reargued before *227the entire court on March 8, 1919. ' The prior hearing before this court occurred on September 24, 1917, and a decision affirming the judgment of the trial court was rendered by this court jrrst prior to December 1, 1918. This action was brought to recover $9,807.45 against the defendant bank by reason of certain notes executed in a real estate transaction. The interveners, who are subsequent stockholders of the bank, interposed a complaint in intervention, alleging an estoppel and praying for a dismissal of plaintiffs’ causes of action. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rankin v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Gerner v. MosherNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Leonard v. State Exchange Bank of Elk CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Flower v. Commercial Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. First National Bank v. State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. ChicoineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re Ryan's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Scandia American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API