Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Chicoine

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1952No. File No. 9259PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The substantial .contention in this contest of the will of Hattie Ryan, deceased, is that the evidence, without dispute, and as a matter of law, establishes a failure to comply with the requirements of SDC 56.0210, in that (1) the testatrix did not publish and declare to the attesting witnesses that the instrument she was subscribing was her will, and (2) the testatrix did not request the attesting witnesses to sign as witnesses. The issues were tried in the county court and a judgment was entered upholding the will. The appeal to the circuit court was limited to questions of law, cf. SDC…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schierbaum v. SchemmeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. German Evangelical Bethel Church of Concordia v. ReithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. In Re Estate of SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In Re Rowland's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In Re Estate of CullbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BurkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Houda's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  3. In Re Ryan's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kurka v. First Nat'l BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re Estate of WalshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API