Legal Opinion

People v. Nunley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2011No. Docket No. 302181PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.

The prosecution appeals by leave granted the circuit court’s order affirming in part the district court’s order denying the prosecution’s motion in limine to admit certain documentary evidence on the ground that it violated defendant’s right to confront witnesses against him.1 The prosecution contends that the circuit court erred by affirming in part the district court’s denial of its motion in limine because the admission of the Secretary of State’s certificate • of mailing would not have violated the Confrontation Clause. Because the circuit court did not abuse its discretion when it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. NunleyMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Law Offices of Jeffrey Sherbow, PC v. Fieger & Fieger, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. ShiversCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Fraser Trebilock Davis & Dunlap, PC v. Boyce Trust 2350Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API