Legal Opinion
State v. Shivers
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 28, 2012No. 1 CA-CR 10-0974PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 A jury convicted Corey Demar Shivers for interfering with judicial proceedings after he violated the terns of an order of protection by contacting the victim in this case. The issue before us is whether the trial court violated Shivers’ Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses by admitting in evidence a written declaration of service of the order without testimony from the law enforcement officer who served Shivers or a showing the officer was unavailable and Shivers had a prior opportunity to cross-examine him. Applying the holdings in Crawford v.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ronald Gaines v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Michael GARCIASupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Logan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2021
- Quartrez Logan, s/k/a Quartrez Rashad Logan v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.