Legal Opinion

Castrignano v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 3, 1988No. 87-306-M.PPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FAY, Chief Justice.

This case was initiated in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island. The plaintiff, Marilyn Cas-trignano (Marilyn), sought to recover damages for injuries that she allegedly incurred in útero when her mother ingested diethylstilbestrol (DES), which the plaintiff claimed was manufactured by the defendant, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. (Squibb). 1

The Federal District Court conducted a jury trial that held Squibb strictly liable in tort and liable for breach of implied warranty of merchantability. After the verdict the trial judge, Chief Judge…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Leibowitz v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Ritter v. Narragansett Electric CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Olson v. Prosoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Savina v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Meridia Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API