Legal Opinion

Viebahn v. Gudim

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1966No. 39667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This is an action to rescind the purchase of a motel. Plaintiffs allege the gross income was misrepresented by the owners and their broker. An advisory jury found the agent guilty of fraud but exonerated the vendors who were, however, held vicariously liable by the court. This appeal is brought by the agent only. Neither the purchasers nor the vendors have cross-appealed. The purchasers have sought review of their right to interest as an offset against rent.

The controlling issues are whether or not, prior to the time the transaction was closed, the vendors disclosed to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Tiedje v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Booth v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. King v. International Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barker v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Brink v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API