Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
The plaintiff claims to have been injured at the intersection of Brownsdale avenue with the defendant railway company’s switch yards in the city of Austin, Minnesota. He brought suit against the railway company and the defendant Irvin J. Beckel, its switch foreman, who he claims was in charge of the switching operations which resulted in his injuries. He recovered a verdict against the company only. It has appealed from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
The plaintiff claims that he received his injuries while he was crossing the defendant company’s switch…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tiedje v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Begin v. Liederbach Bus Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ayer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- McMillen v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- R. L. Turner Motors v. HilkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- State v. LaBarreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Nicholas v. Hennepin Wheel Goods Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.