Legal Opinion

The Anaconda v. American Sugar Refining Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 24, 1944No. 649PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

We granted certiorari because this case poses an important question arising under the United States Arbitration Act. The question arises in these circumstances. The petitioner Smith-Rowland Company, Inc., as owner, chartered to the respondent, American Sugar Refining Company, the barge “Anaconda” for a voyage from Havana, Cuba, to Port Everglades, Florida. After arrival at the latter port, the respondent filed in a federal district court a libel in personam against the petitioner with a prayer for process of foreign attachment, and in rem against the vessel, which was seized by the marshal.

Smi…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. American Sugar Refining Co. v. the AnacondaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  3. American Sugar Refining Co. v. AnacondaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1943
  4. Continental Grain Co. v. Lamport & Holt Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. William Morris Jeanne Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Randal LongfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Morewitz v. West of England Ship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,309 Clarance B. Dickinson, a v. Heinold Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API