Legal Opinion
American Sugar Refining Co. v. the Anaconda
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1943No. 10671PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant filed its libel in rem against the barge “Anaconda” and in personam against Smith-Rowland Company, Inc., its owner. In due course the barge was seized under process in rem and as Smith-Rowland Company’s property under foreign attachment in the suit in personam. Appellee Smith-Rowland Company, Inc. appeared specially and excepted to the jurisdiction of the court on the grounds:, that the contract of charter-party on which the libel was based contained a provision for arbitration; that jurisdiction of the cause of action set out in the libel existed,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Louis Bossert & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Continental Grain Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. J. D. Adams Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Morewitz v. West of England Ship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n (Luxembourg)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- The Anaconda v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cornell & Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Barber & Ross Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- DiMercurio v. Sphere Drake Insurance, PLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.