Legal Opinion

Continental Grain Co. v. Lamport & Holt Line, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 2, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Petitioner moves for an order pursuant to the United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-15, directing that arbitration between Continental Grain Company, petitioner, and Lamport Holt Line, Limited, respondent, proceed in the manner provided for in the arbitration agreement contained in the charter party entered into between the said parties. The matter sought to be arbitrated is an alleged dispute with respect to hire claimed to be due under said charter party for one trip of the motorship Aakre from Canadian to South American ports.

The respondent opposes this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Louis Bossert & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. The VolsinioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
  3. Ex parte De SimoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Anaconda v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. North Pacific International, Inc. v. American Lines/American Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API