Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,309 Clarance B. Dickinson, a v. Heinold Securities, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 6, 1981No. 80-2202PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Heinold Securities, Inc. (“Heinold”) appeals from the order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for a stay of these proceedings pending arbitration and its motion to compel arbitration on selected counts of the complaint. 1 We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiff is a former client of the defendant’s stock options brokerage service. Plaintiff opened his account with Heinold in September of 1975. The agreement between the parties gave Heinold a limited discretionary power to trade plaintiff’s account on the Chicago Board Options…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Buffalo Forge Co. v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cabinetree of Wisconsin, Incorporated v. Kraftmaid Cabinetry, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,406 R. Stockton Rush, III v. Oppenheimer & Co., and Scott SeskisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.