Legal Opinion

MacKenzie v. City of Anadarko

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 1918No. 8691PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Caddo County : Will Linn, Judge. Action by William Mackenzie against the City of Anadarko. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMiley, J.

The city of Anadarko is a city of the first class Pursuant to certain resolutions and ordinances, duly passed, and proceedings regularly taken under chapter 10, Sess. Laws 1907-08, p. 166, as amended by chapter 7, art. 1, Sess. Laws 1909, p. 131, the city council of said city awarded three separate contracts to J. F. Hill for the perma nent Improvement by paving as many streets in fibat city. The contracts were fully performed by the said contractor and the work completed in. accordance therewith. Pursuant to said acts, appraisers were appointed by the mayor and council to appraise and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. City of Pontiac v. Talbot Pav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  5. Fletcher v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Severns Paving Co. v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  4. Settle v. FrakesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Owens v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API