Legal Opinion

Groom v. Dyer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1919No. 9097PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by Walter W. Groom (William L. Cheatham, substituted plaintiff) against Joseph E. Dyer. Judgment for defendant, motion for new trial overruled, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.

’Minnie Barnhill, nee Sawyer, a full-blood Creek Indian, enrolled opposite No. 8421, died February 14, 1907, leaving surviving her Albert Barnhill, her husband, Hepsey Bear, her mother ,and her half-sisters, Susie Johnson, Hattie Bush, and her half-brother, Thomas Lewis. All of the above named were full-blood Indians except the husband. Albert Barnhill. The plaintiff claims title to the allotment by virtue of the deed executed by Hepsey Bear on the 11th day of September, 1911, to A. J. Combs, said deed being approved by the county judge of McIntosh county on the same date.

This action was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pickering v. LomaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lykins v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Maharry v. EatmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Harris v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. BraleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Crowe v. WarnarkeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Silmon v. RahhalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. In Re Leaf's DeedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API