Legal Opinion
Banking Commission v. Bitker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Defendant contends that the court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to his counter-claim, and in holding that he could not set off the bank’s indebtedness to him, as a depositor, against his stockholder’s liability under sec. 221.42, Stats. That section, so far as here material, provides,—
“The stockholders of every bank shall be individually liable, . . . for the benefit of creditors of said bank to the amount of their stock at the par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in said stock. -. . . Such liability shall accrue and become due and payable as to the stockholders of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Andrews v. State Ex Rel. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Jones v. PieningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Citizens Savings & Trust Co. v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Reimers v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- McDonald v. McFersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broderick v. BevilacquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Citizens State Bank v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Cleary v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939