Legal Opinion

Banking Commission v. Bitker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Defendant contends that the court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to his counter-claim, and in holding that he could not set off the bank’s indebtedness to him, as a depositor, against his stockholder’s liability under sec. 221.42, Stats. That section, so far as here material, provides,—

“The stockholders of every bank shall be individually liable, . . . for the benefit of creditors of said bank to the amount of their stock at the par value thereof, in addition to the amount invested in said stock. -. . . Such liability shall accrue and become due and payable as to the stockholders of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Andrews v. State Ex Rel. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Jones v. PieningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Citizens Savings & Trust Co. v. RogersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Reimers v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. McDonald v. McFersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broderick v. BevilacquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Citizens State Bank v. SchmitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cleary v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API