Legal Opinion

Citizens State Bank v. Schmitz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Plaintiff’s cause of action, as alleged in its complaint, is to recover $8,295 on a guaranty signed on December 29, 1933, by defendants, who were some of the stockholders of the State Bank of Random Lake, a Wisconsin banking corporation. That guaranty was given by the defendants to the plaintiff in consideration of the signing by the latter, as the holder of deferred certificates issued by the *554State Bank of Random Lake, of a second stabilization agreement of that bank., Under that guaranty the defendants agreed to pay to the plaintiff on demand certain participating certificates issued,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Divide v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens Trust & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Consolidated School District No. 3Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. State Bank of Commerce v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Foster v. City of LongviewTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dickenson v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API