Legal Opinion

Broderick v. Bevilacqua

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

TMs is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint upon the merits in an action by the Superintendent of Banks to collect from defendant the sum of $2,125, upon his stock liability as a stockholder in a defunct bank, pursuant to section 80 of the Banking Law of the State of New York.

The facts are all stipulated. It is needless to recite them, for the whole case comes down to the question whether defendant may have a set-off, against his stock liability, of the amount contributed by defendant to a certain $50,000 fund advanced by defendant and eleven other stockholders and directors,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Korbly v. Springfield Institution for SavingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. The Mosler Safe Company v. . Guardian Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Van Tuyl v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Banking Commission v. BitkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Broderick v. BrittingNew York Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Banking Commission v. Prudential Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Baumann v. Citizens Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Broderick v. BevilacquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. White v. CoxNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API