Legal Opinion

McDonald v. McFerson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 21, 1926No. 11,609PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

McFerson, as bank commissioner, on a trial to the court, had a judgment against McDonald on a suit to enforce the latter’s statutory liability as a stockholder in the Farmers State and Savings Bank which was in liquidation in the hands of the commissioner, and the defendant brings error and moves for supersedeas.

He introduced no evidence at the trial but contends here that a nonsuit should have been granted because: (1) No indebtedness of the bank was proved; (2) he was not shown to be a stockholder. He also claims that his balance on deposit in the bank should have been set off against his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Zang v. WyantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. STANDARD ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. FRIEDENTHAL.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Lewis v. WinslowSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. BassettWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Atlantic & Pacific Insurance Company v. Combined Insurance Company Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. San Luis Valley Irrigation District v. Prairie Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Melaven v. SchmidtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Banking Commission v. BitkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API