Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2008No. CC 0301-00634; CA A122603; SC S054731PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

Petitioner Kelly Christiansen (plaintiff below), conservator for her minor son, seeks review of a trial court judgment dismissing her medical negligence complaint against defendants on the ground that the action was barred by the five-year limitation period established in ORS 12.110(4). Plaintiff argues that the application of that statute to her son’s case violates the remedy requirement set forth in Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court, concluding that plaintiffs claim was not one that was cognizable at common law when the Oregon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mallison v. PomeroyOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. McLaughlin v. HooverOregon Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Baldro v. TolmieOregon Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ruther v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Klutschkowski v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Ruther v. KaiserOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Jones v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. A.F. v. EvansDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API