Legal Opinion

Ruther v. Kaiser

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-0899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Ruther v. Kaiser, 134 Ohio St.3d 408,

2012-Ohio-5686.] RUTHER, APPELLEE, v. KAISER ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Ruther v. Kaiser, 134 Ohio St.3d 408,

2012-Ohio-5686.] Medical-malpractice actions—Statutes of repose—The medical-malpractice statute of repose found in R.C. 2305.113(C) does not extinguish a vested right and thus does not violate the Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 16—Judgment reversed. (No. 2011-0899—Submitted April 25, 2012—Decided December 6, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No. CA2010-07-066,

2011-Ohio-1723. __________________ SYLLABUS OF…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brandt v. PompaOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Brandt v. PompaOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Weidman v. HildebrandtOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API