Legal Opinion

Ruther v. Kaiser

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-0899PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal is an as-applied constitutional challenge to R.C. 2305.113(C), the statute of repose for medical claims. The Twelfth District Court of Appeals held that R.C. 2305.113(C), as applied to the facts of this case, violates the right-to-remedy clause of the Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 16, relying in part upon Hardy v. VerMeulen, 32 Ohio St.3d 45, 47, 512 N.E.2d 626 (1987). For reasons that follow, we overrule Hardy and reverse the judgment of the Twelfth District Court of Appeals.

I. Background

{¶ 2} R.C. 2305.113(C) sets a four-year statute of repose for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Arbino v. Johnson & JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Antoon v. Cleveland Clinic Found. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Simpkins v. Grace Brethren Church of Delaware, Ohio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. STOLZ v. J & B STEEL ERECTORS, INC., Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. Wheatley, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Hocking County2018

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API