Legal Opinion

Mallison v. Pomeroy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1955PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, J.

The question posed is whether or not plaintiff has a cause of action for injuries sustained by her while she was a viable child in her mother’s womb. The term “viable child” means a child capable of an independent existence without the mother’s womb.

The case arises out of injuries causing cerebral palsy, a condition commonly known as spastic, allegedly sustained by plaintiff on December 25, 1948, while she was an unborn child, her mother then being six months pregnant. Plaintiff’s complaint is predicated upon the negligence of defendant when his car crashed into the rear of a car in which her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Amann v. FaidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Williams v. Marion Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Drobner v. . PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Sinkler v. KnealeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Worgan v. Greggo & Ferrara, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1956
  4. Libbee v. Permanente ClinicOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Keyes v. Construction Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API