Legal Opinion

Sidney O. Sampson v. Ampex Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 23, 1973No. 455, Docket 72-2168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents us, apparently for the first time, with issues involving the application in patent infringement litigation of the estoppel rule of Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313, 91 S.Ct. 1434, 28 L.Ed.2d 788 (1971). Judge Charles M. Metzner of the Southern District of New York found the Blonder-Tongue doctrine applicable to this suit, and ordered Sidney O. Sampson’s patent infringement complaint dismissed. For the reasons given below, we affirm.

I

In any case involving a claim of estop-pel, the prior…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Triplett v. LowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Sidney O. Sampson v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Sidney O. Sampson v. Ampex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Sidney O. Sampson v. Sony Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Richard Lawrence Stevenson v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. Kaiser Industries Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Sampson v. DannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  5. Cardionet, LLC v. Scottcare Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API