Legal Opinion

Cardionet, LLC v. Scottcare Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTucker, District Judge

In the present motion, Defendants, The ScottCare Corporation and Ambucor Health Solutions, Inc., ask that the Court grant their Motion for judgment on the pleadings or, in the alternative, summary judgment with respect to Plaintiffs' asserted claims of United States Patent Nos. 7,212,850 ("'850 Patent") and 7,907,996 ("'996 Patent") because these claims are patent-ineligible pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 101. For the reasons set forth more fully below, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs have alleged that Defendants infringed claims 31 and 32 of the '850…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braemar Manufacturing, LLC v. the Scottcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API