Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Dann

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 2, 1978No. Civ. A. 75-0901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

Sidney O. Sampson, a 75 year old inventor, proceeds here pro se. In 1976 Judge McGuire ordered the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to permit Sampson to cure formal defects in a 1967 patent of a control for sound recording and reproducing systems so that it could be reissued as Sampson had requested. He has filed this post-judgment “Motion For An Urgent Hearing in this Court of Equity Whereby Plaintiff Can Be Given Due Process Proceedings Under 35 U.S.C. 151 Upon His Reissue Application Which this Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abraxis Bioscience, LLC v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Harley v. LehmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
  3. Blacklight Power, Inc. v. DickinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API