Legal Opinion
Borgen v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 8, 1984No. 727, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALPERT, Judge.
Facts and Proceedings
On September 21, 1981, Arthur Lineberry, manager of a Texaco station located at 600 Quince Orchard Road, Gaithersburg, Maryland, arrived at work and discovered that a tool chest containing various automotive tools had been broken into. It appeared to Lineberry that none of the doors of the premises had been broken or pried. Nine days later Lineberry provided the police with an inventory of the stolen tools.
On December 19, 1981, Walter Henry Borgen, appellant, was arrested for his alleged involvement in two offenses not related to the offenses herein alleged…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Riddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Tapscott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Aguilar v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.