Legal Opinion

Aguilar v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 4, 1991No. 1543, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRITY, Judge.

Over twenty years ago the United States Supreme Court, in the case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), created what is now known as the stop and frisk exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement. At the time the exception was first recognized, it was considered by legal writers to have only limited application. Over the years the exception’s application has been broadened so that automobiles and even homes are subject to a police search under the exception. In the case before us we are asked to decide whether the scope of a Terry search…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. In Re David S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Munafo v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API