Rodriguez v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Plaintiff’s alleged idea or plan could not be made the subject of a property right in the absence of its protection by contract prior to disclosure. (Bristol v. Equitable Life Assur. Society, 132 N. Y. 264; Williamson v. New York Central R. R. Co., 258 App. Div. 226.) We hold it established on this record that defendant Western Union Telegraph Company’s agent, with whom the claimed oral agreement for compensation was made, had no authority on behalf of said defendant to make any binding contract such as is claimed herein either within the scope of express or apparent authority; and, assuming…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Mayer v. . McCreeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Petze v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Williamson v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Grombach Productions, Inc. v. WaringNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Bowen v. Yankee Network, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- O'Brien v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Bernice Stevens v. Continental Can Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.