Avery v. Butler
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Michael G. Munly, Judge. Suit by Avery & Opdycke against Butler & Dill, and others, to foreclose a mechanics’ lien. The Builders’ Sash & Door Mfg. Co. intervened to foreclose a lien, and from a decree dismissing its claims it appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
*288Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
This is a suit to foreclose a mechanics’ lien upon a house and lot at Piedmont, Multnomah County, the property of the defendant the Investment Company, a corporation, but which it had agreed to sell and convey to the defendant Ben C. Irwin. The material facts are that on August 8, 1892, the Investment Company entered into a contract with the defendants Butler & Dill, by which the latter agreed to furnish the material and erect a house on said lot in consideration of $2,312, $1,500 to be paid as the work progressed, $406 when the house was entirely completed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- George Ainslie & Co. v. Bertha Kohn & Thompson, De Hart & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Nichols v. CulverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- St. Louis National Stock Yards v. O'ReillyIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Conlee v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic BishopOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Holmes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Birkemeier v. KnobelOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Arctic Lumber Co. v. BordenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Craig v. Crystal Realty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.