Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McMillan v. Ashtabula County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1992No. 92-1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 3513.05 states:

“ * * * The declaration of candidacy and all separate petition papers shall be filed at the same time as one instrument. * * * ”

McMillan, inter alia, argues that the board had no authority to accept any petition papers other than those first filed on July 2 and, since those petition papers contained fewer than the number of legally required signatures, the board should have ruled Kobelak off the ballot. The board responds that a *188candidate who relies to his detriment on erroneous information given him by a board of elections should be permitted to file a new set of petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Svete v. Board of Elections of Geauga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State ex rel. Shaw v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Weaver v. WietheOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API