State ex rel. Weaver v. Wiethe
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The charter of Cincinnati (Section 4, Article IX) requires that “all separate papers comprising a nominating petition shall he assembled and filed * * * as one instrument # # (Emphasis supplied.) Confronted with this explicit direction, relator attempted to circumvent it. Learning of the insufficiency of his original petition, he sought to withdraw it so that he might again assemble and file the separate papers thereof, together with other separate papers containing additional signatures sufficient to meet the minimum number required.
Failing this, relator’s principal contention now is that by *3…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Rose v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. McMillan v. Ashtabula County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Dennis v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. McMillan v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.