Biltmore Press v. Usadel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
The parties to this appeal concede that the memorandum of decision of the trial court fairly outlines the facts of this case. We are of the view that not only are the facts' fairly stated in that decision, but the issues presently before us are adequately determined therein. We adopt the statement of facts and pertinent portions of the legal analysis as set forth in the trial court’s memorandum of decision, with appropriate deletions and additions of our own comments (shown in brackets), as the opinion of this court:
“Plaintiff’s complaint contains three counts:…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. HeustisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Lee v. DeForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tsemetzin v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Filmservice Laboratories, Inc. v. Harvey Bernhard Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989