Pedroza v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
773 So.2d 639 (2000)
Pedro Salsedo PEDROZA, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D99-1500.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
December 15, 2000.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for Appellee.
SAWAYA, J.
The State of Florida, the appellee, instituted commitment proceedings against Pedro Salsedo Pedroza, the appellant, pursuant to the "Jimmy Ryce Act," hereinafter referred to as the Act.[1] The…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Westerheide v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Ed Ricke & Sons v. Green by and Through SwanSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Hagan v. Sun Bank of Mid-FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kidd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Rodriguez v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- DONOVAN M. HENRY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Pogar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.