State v. Nance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeogden, J.
There was sufficient evidence upon all the essential elements of the crime to be submitted to the jury, and the only exception meriting serious consideration occurs upon the following excerpt from the record: “During the argument to the jury of Mr. F. B. Benbow, one of the counsel for the defendant, he turned to the acting solicitor and said, in substance: ‘Why didn’t you put witnesses on the stand to show the defendant’s bad character? You scoured the country with a fine tooth comb for other witnesses against the defendant, but you dared not offer witnesses as to his bad character because…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Edwards v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Underwood, Marsh & Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Zirkle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.