Legal Opinion

Borchardt v. Kulick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 8, 1951No. 35,409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

This action was brought by plaintiff against Apolonia Kulick and Alex Kulick, on the theory that they were partners in the operation of a garage in Brainerd, Minnesota, to recover for an alleged breach of an oral contract to employ plaintiff as a mechanic or foreman for a period of one year from July 1, 1948. Plaintiff recovered a verdict against Apolonia Kulick only, so she will be referred to hereinafter as defendant.

It is plaintiff’s contention, and his…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Brandeis v. NeustadtlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  4. Howard v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Schwinn v. GriffithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API